Welcome to the philosophical and spiritual musings of...
Blogging Dating Politics Relationships Personal Development Spirituality
 

Wednesday, February 08, 2006

Muslim crisis planned by the US

Fascinating news is emerging that the Muslim crisis is a planned psyop (psychological operation) conducted by the US, in order to purposefully inflame Muslims. The reason for this is that with the Muslims on a rampage, it makes it easier for America to begin acting against Muslim-controlled nations, like Iran.

Stratfor also think something similar:
Still, there are two clear beneficiaries. One is the United States: The cartoon affair is serving to further narrow the rift between the Bush administration's view of the Islamic world and that of many Europeans. Between the Paris riots last year, the religiously motivated murder of a Dutch filmmaker and the "blame Denmark" campaign, European patience is wearing thin. The other beneficiary is Iran. As Iran moves toward a confrontation with the United States over nuclear weapons, this helps to rally the Muslim world to its side: Iran wants to be viewed as the defender of Islam, and Sunnis who have raised questions about its flirtations with the United States in Iraq are now seeing Iran as the leader in outrage against Europe.
There's also an article here that says the same thing:
Commenting on the Muslim riots sweeping the Middle East and Europe, Zhirinovsky ... said that the publication of the offensive cartoons was a planned psyop on the part of the US and aimed to “provoke a row between Europe and the Islamic world”.
The violent demonstrations, on the back of last November's French riots, are clearly having the effect of hardening European sympathy towards Muslims, even as the governments of major European countries open the floodgates to mass immigration. This greases the skids for an accelerated invasion of Iran who yesterday announced they were cutting trade with Denmark over the offensive cartoons.
Enough to make you think, isn't it...

If there's war against Iran and Muslims, it's - once again - because the United States has made it happen.

Gotta love America....

Posted on 2/08/2006 07:43:00 PM


If you have found value in what Alan (the author) has given you, please leave a donation for him so you can enjoy the spirit of giving too.

3 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Stratfor also said it could have been Iran and/or Syria provoking the riots and reactions, to obtain primacy in the muslim world as the "nation most outraged against the west."
Stratfor's report also included: "There are beneficiaries. It is important to note here that the fact that someone benefits from something does not mean that he was responsible for it. (We say this because in the past, when we have noted the beneficiaries of an event or situation, the not-so-bright bulbs in some quarters took to assuming that we meant the beneficiaries deliberately engineered the event.)"

So the US and Iran both benefit, and you believe some Russian who blames the US?

I hope you're being sarcastic...

2/09/2006 05:10:00 PM  
Blogger Alan Howard said...

If I was being sarcastic, you wouldn't have to ask. ;-)

You only need to look at history to understand where the truth might be.

2/09/2006 06:06:00 PM  
Blogger nomorewar said...

There is no surprise for those who have read this book written by a Rockefeller's puppet (he founded the Trilateral Commission) who crafted the Blueprint for World War in 1997 long before 11th September:

The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives

by brzezinski who is also responsible for recruiting ... Ben Laden : Interview of Zbigniew Brzezinski: How I Started the Mujahideen and the Jihad


Excerpt from the book

"The attitude of the American public toward the external projection of American power has been much more ambivalent. The public supported America's engagement in World War II largely because of the shock effect of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor." (pp 24-5)

"In the long run, global politics are bound to become increasingly uncongenial to the concentration of hegemonic power in the hands of a single state. Hence, America is not only the first, as well as the only, truly global superpower, but it is also likely to be the very last." (p.209)

"Moreover, as America becomes an increasingly multi-cultural society, it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat." (p. 211)

"...To put it in a terminology that harkens back to the more brutal age of ancient empires, the three grand imperatives of imperial geostrategy are to prevent collusion and maintain security dependence among the vassals, to keep tributaries pliant and protected, and to keep the barbarians from coming together." (p.40)

"Henceforth, the United States may have to determine how to cope with regional coalitions that seek to push America out of Eurasia, thereby threatening America's status as a global power." (p.55)

7/31/2007 02:59:00 PM  

Post a Comment


(C) Alan Howard 1998 - 2006