The facts of the Holocaust
4 comments
![](http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/2085/1205/200/swastika.0.jpg)
On April 18 1945, The New York Times reported that 4 million people died at Auschwitz. This single peice of newspaper reporting was used as evidence of the Holocaust for over 50 years. However, on January 26 1995, commemorating the 50th anniversary of the Auschwitz liberation, both the Washington Post and the New York Times reported that Polish authorities had determined that 1.5 million people at most, of all races and religions, died at Auschwitz of all causes, including natural causes. Official mention is here, where they state that the reason for the inflated figure was to 'demonize Fascism and enhance legitimacy of the Communist regime'.
What that means is that they lied.
Interestingly, reducing the Auschwitz death toll apparently does not change the numbers of Jews killed in the Holocaust. Personally, I'd like to know where the extra 3.5 MILLION came from, if they weren't from Auschwitz. There's no explanation of that.
If we take the original figure of 6 million, of which 4 million were said to have died at Auschwitz, and modify it with the new official figures of only 1.5 million PEOPLE who died at Auschwitz, we have the amazing figure of only 2 million JEWS dying due to the Holocaust.
Is it still a Holocaust at this point?
The death toll of the entire Second World War was 50 MILLION people. This site here has some great figures of the casualties.
Soldiers: 22.0M
Civilians
- In camps, from Fascist terror: 12.0M
- From hostilites, blockade, epidemics, hunger: 14.5M
- From bombing: 1.5M
The country-by-country death toll (for figures over a million) is:
USSR: 20.0M
China: 10.45M
Poland: 5.8M
Germany: 5.5M
India: 2.15M
Japan: 1.9M
Yugoslavia: 1.55M
Who really had a Holocaust? The Jews, or any of the other countries above?
My dictionary defines a holocaust as: An act of great destruction and loss of life.
What gives the Jews the rights to claim ownership of 'holocaust', when it applies to so many other countries, and so many other victims? And especially when the figure of how many Jews died has changed over the years, becoming less and less as time has gone by.
The Jews, however, particularly the Israelis and the ADL, still bandy around the figure of 6 million dead, disregarding how the official figure has dropped to only 2 million. 'Holocaust denial' has become something that is worthy of imprisonment, and it seems that imprisonments are happening more today than in the past 6 years.
Could it be that it serves the purposes of the Jews to be pitied for the Holocaust as they want us to believe it? Could the benefits of being victims be so great to them, that the possibility of being considered liars and opportunists be worth keeping silent those who talk about the truth?
I've said it before, and I'll say it again. If there were no inconsistencies with the figures, we wouldn't be talking about it. If you preach about untruths, then you're considered an idiot. But if you're locked away for speaking those 'untruths', then the authorities show they have something to hide, especially when evidence proving the official story to be a lie is destroyed.
Posted on 2/28/2006 10:11:00 AM
![](https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_edit_allbkg.gif)
If you have found value in what Alan (the author) has given you, please leave a donation for him so you can enjoy the spirit of giving too.